After classes had ended I attended a guest talk by an ethicist and physician, Dr. Barron Lerner, on the changes in medical ethics from the times of his father, who was also a physician, to his own contemporary views. The takeaway was that medicine used to be far more paternalistic, with doctors making decisions on behalf of patients without ever necessarily consulting the patients themselves.
One dramatic example made my classmates and me question whether our current legal and moral framework is truly the best. An ailing woman who was terminally ill and had expressed a desire to discontinue treatment suddenly coded (cardiac arrest). She had not signed a DNR (do not resuscitate) form so the hospital staff went to call the code team, as they are required to do by policy and law. The speaker's father yelled for them to stop, saying that this was wrong and that the moral thing to do was to let the woman die with dignity. The staff called the code anyway and when the team arrived, the speaker's father literally laid his body across her chest to prevent them from doing CPR, and the woman died. Today, such an action would likely result in a lawsuit and/or sanctioning by the hospital. But was it truly wrong? I don't know.

following day.
TIL: Hippocratic medicine was founded on the principles of the four humors, which though not correct, was the first time disease was attributed to natural causes rather than deities and treatment to physical action by physicians as opposed to intervention by said deities. The Hippocratic age was also the origin of the technique of taking a history and physical, as well as keeping a medical record for empirical research about the efficacy of treatments.
No comments:
Post a Comment